Detailed performance evaluation framework for the AZ Learner core team.
Use this guide during the meeting to assess each member fairly and constructively.
Can Francis articulate a clear, compelling, and specific direction for AZ Learner over the next 3–6 months? Does every team member understand the goal because of his communication?
__/5
Goal-Setting
Has Francis defined measurable OKRs or milestones for Q1/Q2? Are team deliverables mapped to those goals? Check whether targets were met from the previous meeting.
__/5
Decision-Making Quality
When the team faced blockers (e.g., feature trade-offs, resource constraints), how quickly and decisively did Francis act? Were outcomes of those decisions positive?
__/5
Product Prioritization
Does Francis consistently prioritize the right features and tasks for students? Is there evidence of user research influencing product decisions (e.g., new print, CV, GPA tools)?
__/5
🤝 Team Leadership & Culture
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Team Morale
Do team members feel motivated and valued? Ask each person individually. High morale shows up as proactive contributions and low turnover of active members.
__/5
Delegation
Is Francis delegating effectively, or is he a bottleneck? Each department head should have clear ownership. Verify that roles aren't overlapping without coordination.
__/5
Availability & Responsiveness
Is Francis accessible when team members need guidance? Measure response time on group chats and how often team members mention waiting on Francis before they can proceed.
__/5
Conflict Resolution
When disagreements arose (priorities, workload, etc.), did Francis mediate fairly and reach a resolution that the team accepted? Give a specific example if possible.
__/5
🌍 External Representation & Growth
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Brand Positioning
How often is Francis publicly promoting AZ Learner (social media, campus events, speaking)? Is the brand perception among UCC students improving?
__/5
Partnership Outreach
Has Francis initiated or followed through on any institutional or sponsor partnerships since the last review?
__/5
Revenue Thinking
Is there a clear revenue model being actively pursued? (e.g., CV premium sales, print jobs, ambassador program fees, Paystack flows). Were revenue targets hit?
__/5
💬 Discussion Questions for Francis
What is the single most important thing AZ Learner must achieve in the next 30 days, and what specifically are you doing to make it happen?
Which team member do you think is most under-utilised right now, and what is your plan to change that?
What was the hardest decision you made since the last meeting, and what would you do differently?
How are you measuring the product's impact on students — and what do the numbers say?
What resource (time, money, skills) is the biggest constraint right now, and what is your concrete plan to address it?
How many ambassadors are currently active vs. dormant? A healthy program should have a clearly tracked roster with each ambassador's campus, reach, and last activity date.
__/5
Onboarding & Training
When new ambassadors join, is there a structured onboarding process (welcome kit, brand guidelines, talking points)? Are new ambassadors functional within 2 weeks of joining?
__/5
Ambassador Retention
How many ambassadors from the previous period are still active? Low retention suggests insufficient incentive structure or engagement. What has Andy done to keep ambassadors engaged?
__/5
Performance Tracking
Does Andy have data on each ambassador's referral conversions, social media posts, and campus events? Is this tracked in a spreadsheet or the AZ Learner ambassador dashboard?
__/5
Geographic Expansion
Is the ambassador network growing beyond UCC to other Ghanaian universities (KNUST, UG, UENR)? How many new campuses have been added since the last review?
__/5
🗣️ Communication & People Skills
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Internal Communication
How effectively does Andy communicate ambassador updates to the CEO and full team? Are reports timely and useful, or are updates only given when asked?
__/5
Motivating Others
Ambassadors are volunteers — does Andy keep them motivated? Check if ambassadors respond positively when asked. Does he recognise top performers publicly?
__/5
Handling Issues
When an ambassador misbehaved or underperformed, how did Andy handle it? Was it addressed swiftly and professionally without damaging morale?
__/5
📈 Impact on User Growth
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Referral Conversions
How many new AZ Learner sign-ups or app downloads can be directly attributed to ambassador activities in the past period? This should be a specific number, not an estimate.
__/5
Campus Event Execution
How many campus activations, demos, or tabling events happened? For each one: Was it well-attended? Did it generate leads? Was feedback collected?
__/5
💬 Discussion Questions for Andy
Give us the exact number of active ambassadors today, the campuses they represent, and the total student reach.
What specific user-growth metric improved most because of ambassador activities last period?
Which ambassador is performing best right now — and what are you doing to learn from and replicate their approach?
What is the biggest bottleneck preventing the ambassador program from scaling, and what do you need from the team to fix it?
How are you personally developing your leadership and people-management skills to lead a growing team?
Are all AZ Learner assets (social media graphics, app UI elements, podcast artwork, ambassador kits) visually consistent with the brand palette, typography, and tone? Spot-check 3 recent deliverables.
__/5
Turnaround Time
When design tasks are assigned, does Bright deliver on time? Check the last 5 design requests and measure the gap between request date and delivery date.
__/5
Design Depth
Are designs exploratory (multiple concepts presented) or always first-draft? Does Bright offer rationale for design choices, or simply produce and deliver?
__/5
Responsiveness to Feedback
When revisions are requested, are they incorporated accurately and without repeated back-and-forth? Does Bright ask clarifying questions upfront to avoid rework?
__/5
Podcast Visual Support
Since Bright is specifically supporting the AZ Podcast: Are episode artwork, audiogram graphics, and social promos produced for every episode? Are they ready before the episode drops?
__/5
🧠 Strategic Thinking
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Proactive Design Initiatives
Has Bright proposed any design improvements that weren't asked for — e.g., a refreshed landing page layout, a new icon set, or a cohesive brand guide document?
__/5
Understanding the User
Does Bright's design work reflect an understanding of the target users (Ghanaian university students)? Are designs accessible, mobile-first, and culturally appropriate?
__/5
Cross-Team Collaboration
When Jude or Andy needs design assets for marketing/ambassador campaigns, does Bright collaborate proactively, or does work get delayed because of siloed communication?
__/5
💬 Discussion Questions for Bright
Walk us through the last design project you completed from brief to delivery. What decisions did you make and why?
What design assets does AZ Learner urgently need that don't exist yet? What is your plan to create them?
How do you keep your design skills current? Have you explored any new tools or design trends recently that could benefit the brand?
Has the podcast design support been keeping up with the release schedule? If not, what needs to change?
If you could change one thing about the current AZ Learner brand identity, what would it be and why?
How many posts went out across all AZ Learner social channels (Twitter/X, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok) in the past month? Is there a content calendar, and is it being followed?
__/5
Content Quality
Are posts clearly written, on-brand, and engaging? Check the last 10 posts across platforms. Evaluate grammar, tone, visual quality, and call-to-action clarity.
__/5
Engagement Rate
What is the average engagement rate (likes + comments + shares / reach) on social posts? Benchmark: ≥3% is good for student-focused content on Instagram. Share actual numbers.
__/5
Follower Growth
What is the month-over-month follower growth across all channels? A minimum of 5% growth per month is a reasonable target for an early-stage student startup. Show specific data.
__/5
Storytelling & Narrative
Is the brand story being told compellingly? Does the content explain why AZ Learner exists and what it does for students — not just feature announcements?
__/5
🚀 Campaign Execution
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Campaign Planning
Are marketing campaigns (e.g., sign-up drives, feature launches, semester-start pushes) planned in advance with clear goals, timelines, and success metrics?
__/5
Campaign Results
For the last campaign run: What was the goal? What was achieved? How did it impact downloads/sign-ups? Was there a post-campaign retrospective?
__/5
Coordination with Andy
Marketing campaigns should feed into the ambassador program (and vice versa). How well does Jude coordinate with Andy to ensure messaging is consistent at both digital and on-campus levels?
__/5
📰 PR & External Communications
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Media & Press Outreach
Has Jude pitched AZ Learner to any student publications, campus radio stations, or tech media? How many press mentions or features have been secured?
__/5
Crisis Communication
If any negative user feedback was made public (e.g., a tweet, a post), how was it handled? Was there a timely, professional, and empathetic response?
__/5
💬 Discussion Questions for Jude
Show us the exact social media analytics from the past 4 weeks — which post performed best and what does that tell us about our audience?
What is the current content calendar for the next 30 days? Walk us through it.
What marketing channel is currently most effective at driving new users, and what are we doing to double down on it?
Is there a student publication or media outlet we haven't reached yet that you think we should target? What's your plan?
How are you building your own communication and marketing knowledge? Have you found any frameworks or strategies from your studies that you've applied to AZ Learner?
When users report account problems (locked out, wrong subscription status, missing print order), how quickly does Emmanuel resolve them? Target: same-day resolution for critical issues.
__/5
Support Quality
Are user communications professional, warm, and clear? Check the last 5 support interactions (WhatsApp, email, form responses) and evaluate tone, accuracy, and completeness.
__/5
Escalation Judgement
Does Emmanuel know which issues to handle independently and which to escalate to Francis or Chinedum? Are escalations done with enough context for quick resolution?
__/5
Proactive Issue Detection
Rather than waiting for users to report issues, does Emmanuel regularly audit user accounts for anomalies (e.g., missing XP, failed print submissions, duplicate accounts)?
__/5
📂 Content & Resource Administration
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Content Accuracy
Is the content on AZ Learner (course info, resources, event listings) current and accurate? How frequently does Emmanuel audit and update content? Were any outdated items found recently?
__/5
Data Organisation
Is operational data (user lists, print order logs, ambassador records) well-organised and accessible to the team? Is there a clear filing system that others can use without asking Emmanuel?
__/5
Documentation
Are processes documented so that another team member could step in if Emmanuel is unavailable? This is critical for continuity. Ask to see a process doc for at least 2 admin workflows.
__/5
📅 Scheduling & Coordination
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Meeting Coordination
Are team meetings scheduled and communicated in advance? Are agendas prepared and circulated before each meeting? Are minutes taken and shared within 24 hours?
__/5
Print Order Facilitation
How many print orders were processed last period? Were any orders delayed or lost? What is the average time from order submission to delivery confirmation?
__/5
💬 Discussion Questions for Emmanuel
Walk us through the most complex user issue you resolved recently — what happened, what did you do, and what was the outcome?
If you were unavailable for a week, which administrative process would break down first, and what can we do to prevent that?
How many print orders have been processed in the last 30 days, and what was the average turnaround time?
What user feedback have you collected recently, and have you surfaced any insights to the team from that feedback?
What one change to the admin workflow would save you the most time and make the team more efficient?
Are all income and expenses recorded and reconciled? Ask Ibrahim to present the current balance sheet and P&L summary for the period. Data should be current within 7 days.
__/5
Revenue Tracking
Can Ibrahim break down revenue by source (CV sales, print jobs, ambassador subscriptions, other)? Are Paystack transactions reconciled against reported income?
__/5
Expense Control
Are expenses categorised and within budget? Are any expenses unaccounted for? Has Ibrahim flagged any unusual spend to the CEO in a timely manner?
__/5
Forecasting
Has Ibrahim produced a financial forecast for the next quarter? Does the forecast reflect realistic assumptions based on current user growth and revenue trends?
__/5
Audit Readiness
If an external audit were required tomorrow, are financial records complete, organised, and traceable? Is there a clear paper trail for every transaction?
__/5
📊 Financial Strategy & Analysis
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Cost Optimisation Ideas
Has Ibrahim identified any cost-saving opportunities? For example: lower-cost hosting alternatives, renegotiating service fees, or reducing transaction costs on Paystack payments?
__/5
Break-Even Analysis
Does Ibrahim know the break-even point for AZ Learner? How close is the organisation to covering its operating costs from revenue? This should be presented as a specific figure.
__/5
Financial Reporting to Team
Is the team kept informed of financial health in regular, easy-to-understand reports (not just raw spreadsheet data)? Does Ibrahim present insights, not just numbers?
__/5
Risk Identification
Has Ibrahim flagged any financial risks (e.g., single revenue source dependency, delayed payments, unexpected costs) proactively — before they became problems?
__/5
💬 Discussion Questions for Ibrahim
Present the current financial position of AZ Learner: total income this period, total expenses, and net position. Be specific with numbers.
Which revenue stream grew fastest last period, and what does your model say that means for next quarter?
What is our single biggest financial risk right now, and what is your recommended mitigation?
Has every Paystack transaction been reconciled against our books? Were there any discrepancies, and how were they resolved?
As an actuarial science student, what specific analytical techniques from your studies have you applied to AZ Learner's financial model?
How many features or fixes were shipped in the last period? Are they deployed and working in production? Cross-reference with GitHub commits and the task backlog.
__/5
Code Reliability
Did any of Chinedum's recent changes introduce bugs or regressions in production? What is the ratio of new features introduced to bugs introduced? Lower is better.
__/5
Security Awareness
Does Chinedum apply basic web security practices? For example: escaping user input before injecting into innerHTML, not hardcoding secrets, correct Firestore security rule scoping?
__/5
Mobile-First & Responsiveness
Since AZ Learner's primary audience uses mobile devices, are all pages developed by Chinedum fully responsive and tested on both Android and iOS? Check 3 recent pages on a phone.
__/5
Code Consistency
Does Chinedum's code follow the existing conventions in the codebase (e.g., camelCase variables, window.app pattern, inline event handlers, CDN-only dependencies)? Spot-check recent commits.
__/5
🔧 Collaboration & Development Process
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Requirement Clarification
Before starting a development task, does Chinedum ask the right questions to avoid building the wrong thing? Evaluate whether his output typically matches what was requested.
__/5
Status Communication
Does Chinedum give regular development updates without being asked? Are blockers flagged early so the team can adjust timelines? Is he reachable and responsive?
__/5
Cross-Functional Support
When Emmanuel reports a user issue that requires a code fix, or when Francis requests a quick feature, how efficiently does Chinedum collaborate and turn it around?
__/5
Self-Development
As a hospitality student learning to code, is Chinedum actively improving his technical skills? What has he learned or built on his own initiative since the last review?
__/5
🗺️ Technical Roadmap Contribution
Criterion
What to look for
Score (1–5)
Technical Proposal Quality
When new features are being planned, does Chinedum contribute technical perspective on feasibility, complexity, and risks? Are his estimates accurate?
__/5
Performance Optimisation
Has Chinedum proactively identified and fixed any performance issues (slow page loads, heavy images, Firebase read costs)? Is the app measurably faster than last period?
__/5
💬 Discussion Questions for Chinedum
Walk us through the last feature you built end-to-end: what was the brief, what did you build, what edge cases did you handle, and how did you test it?
What is the most technically challenging issue in the current codebase, and what is your proposed solution?
Which page or feature has the most user complaints, and what specifically would you change to fix it?
How are you balancing your academic workload with your development responsibilities on AZ Learner? What is your realistic capacity per week?
If you could rebuild any single part of AZ Learner from scratch, what would it be, and how would you do it differently?
After completing all individual evaluations, close the meeting by confirming:
✅ Each member has received at least one piece of specific, actionable feedback.
✅ Each member has committed to at least one measurable improvement by the next meeting.
✅ All department heads have updated their action items in the shared task tracker.
✅ The next meeting date has been confirmed and communicated to all members.
✅ Any cross-functional blockers identified during evaluations have been assigned an owner and a resolution deadline.